Lisa Huberman is the author of the horror play Heart/Succor, which premiered at Fresh Blood in July 2012. Her monologue Easy Breezy Blood-Sucking was performed at Bloody Gore-geous Monologues in February 2013. -KP
The scariest movie I ever saw as
a kid was The Little Mermaid.
That’s weird, right? For most
people it’s something like It or Halloween or the wood-chipper scene from
Fargo. Straight-up horror never really appealed to
me-- I guess I’ve always liked being different.
As a plucky redhead with
ambitions of being a singer, it’s not hard to see why I identified with the
fiery, headstrong Ariel. Just like Ariel
felt out of place in her undersea world, I felt out of place in suburban
Ohio. Plus she had an irrational
attachment to her collection of useless shit—a legacy that I carry on to this
day, much to my dad’s chagrin.
Looking back to the film there’s
lot that’s cringe-worthy. Take awkward 90s-era racism with the red-lipped
“blackfish” in the “Under the Sea” sequence. Then there’s the regressive gender politics. Unlike the sensible, level-headed Belle and
the cool, acerbic Jasmine of later Disney films, who keep their romantic
counterparts at bay with their wits, Ariel is kind of the worst romantic role
model ever. Girlfriend is so boy-crazy
she puts herself and her entire marine kingdom in jeopardy for the
self-centered pursuit of a dude with whom she has literally never had a
conversation.
Ariel refuses to take "He's just not that into fish," for an answer. |
Their whole conflict is meant to
be metaphorical— in Ariel, we’re supposed to see the typical teenage girl
struggling with her father about questions of prejudice and parental
control. But for some reason, at six or
seven, this image gripped me. And while the film itself never put Ariel in any
real danger, Sebastian spends an entire song fleeing the knife of a French
chef, and misses being devoured by Prince Eric’s manservant by a heartbeat. The idea that in another version of the
story, Ariel— who I had come to know, love and-- could be captured by a fisherman
and gutted and devoured like just another fish fascinated terrified, and
disturbed me.
And in my idle hours, I started
imagining those possibilities— poor Ariel dangling in a net, Ariel being
auctioned off in the fish market, Ariel trapped in some crate in the chef’s
kitchen, watching the knifes being sharpened, the smells of a marinade wafting
through her nostrils. What would be
going through her mind, I wondered-- how she might try to reason with her
captors?
The scenes would rarely move
beyond that point—I’ve never been much for blood, guts, or gore. It was the trapped feeling that interested
me. That moment when the protagonist
realizes she has gone too far in her ambitions, strayed from the path, and passed the point of no return. Nowadays, we’re told by our parents and self-help
books that we can learn from our failings— in high school I once saw a poster
that said “It’s okay to make mistakes:
that’s why pencils have erasers.” We want to believe it, but we’ve been hard-wired for millennia with
cautionary tales about the perils of curiosity, from the Biblical Eve biting an
apple and being cast out of Eden, to Pandora opening a box and letting terror
into the world, to Persephone eating the food of the dead and being condemned
to spend half the year in the Underworld, to Little Red Riding Hood revealing
her destination to the stranger that devours her grandmother. Towards the end of “The Little Mermaid,”
King Triton takes Ariel’s place in the Faustian bargain with Ursula and our
heroine is forced to watch her father transform into one the shriveled,
krill-like creatures doomed to spend his life at the bottom of the sea witch’s
lair because of her own impulsive actions. Prince Eric comes to her rescue in the end (again, regressive gender
politics), but the threat feels real nonetheless: one false move and you’ll go
too far, upset the balance of the universe, and the world— or at least your world— will
never be the same.
The battle here is not so much
between a physical life and death of the body, but innocence and survival. It’s the Donner party question: do you let yourself die of starvation in the
wilderness or do you make a meal of your comrades’ corpses for the possibility
of another day?
For most of my life these
thoughts stayed mostly in my own head. In seventh grade I stopped sharing my genre stories after my parents
became disturbed when they read a story I wrote called “Dream No Evil.” For my parents, the mind that created these
stories didn’t square with the sweet little girl who played softball and wrote
editorials in the school paper about having too much homework. Like King Triton, my parents didn’t want to
think of me at such a young age being caught up in the fisherman’s net of fear
and depression. So for the next decade, I burrowed these images away and reserved my messed-up fantasies to the
contents of my mind, gaining occasional relief in the occasional Angela Carter short
story or Buffy rerun.
I’ve enjoyed writing for La
Petite as an opportunity to explore this emotional space. In last year’s “Fresh
Blood” festival, I had short play that featured a new vampire contemplating her
first kill as she meets cute with a hipster on the L train. Our heroine must
balance her physical need for human blood with her attraction to this boy, who,
in another story, in another reality, could be the Harry to her Sally, the Joel
to her Clementine. In the original Hans
Christian Anderson tale, the prince never does realize the mermaid is the one
who saved his life on the beach, and because three days have passed, she will
soon die and become sea foam. Her
sisters obtain a knife from the sea witch that will allow her to turn back into
a mermaid if she kills the prince. So
now she has a choice: in addition to
letting go of her humanity, in order to survive she must also accept the fact
that a happy ending can no longer be part of her story.
Now that’s scary.
No comments:
Post a Comment